Main Article Content

Authors

This article inquires about the way American intellectuals understood the concept of race at the end of the XVIII Century. It speciically analyzes how Francisco Jose Clavigero, Antonio Sánchez- Valverde and Eugenio Espejo responded to Jean Astruc's claims that the Americas were the origin of social evil and to the somatic deinitions created by Astruc’s text. The article points out that the analogy of optical igures such as mirror, relection and difraction are useful when discussing the problem of coloniality.

Mónica Eraso Jurado, Universidad Pedagógica Nacional

Profesora de Historia y Teoría del Arte en la Licenciatura en Artes Visuales de la Universidad Pedagógica Nacional, Bogotá (Colombia). Maestra en Artes Plásticas de la Universidad de los Andes, Magíster en Estudios Culturales de la Universidad Javeriana, grado Cum Laude. Becaria del Programa de Estudios Independientes del Museo de Arte Contemporáneo de Barcelona (bienio 2010-2011). E-mail: monicaeraso@yahoo.com

Eraso Jurado, M. (2018). Colonial mirrors: the criollos in the dispute of the social evil. Nómadas, (45), 141–151. Retrieved from https://editorial.ucentral.edu.co/ojs_uc/index.php/nomadas/article/view/2474

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Similar Articles

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.